
Actor profile / Person
Katherine Johnson
Mathematician · 1918–2020
Applied mathematics / Spaceflight
Understand trajectories. Check the calculations.
Mathematical methods for spaceflight, developed within the teams at Langley.
AI-generated conceptual illustration.
- 1953–1986 · Langley
- Research workplace
- NACA → NASA
- Applied mathematics / Spaceflight
Selected contributions
What she contributed
Katherine Johnson worked on trajectory analysis and checked calculations within the NACA and NASA teams. The contributions below distinguish her own role from the collective achievement. [2]
Calculating an orbital trajectory
Coauthor with T. H. Skopinski · Technical report, 1960Their report determines the direction at the end of powered flight needed for a satellite to pass over a chosen position on the rotating Earth.
[1] Read the source
Method, assumptions and limits
The report uses orbital geometry, first with a spherical rotating Earth, then with corrections for Earth’s oblateness. It includes worked examples. This illustration is not a measured trajectory or a reconstruction of a Mercury flight. [1]
Checking flight calculations
Mercury · 1962Before John Glenn’s 1962 Mercury flight, she checked the computer calculations, as documented in NASA’s biography.
[2] Read the sourcePeople & collaborations
A collective effort
Coauthors, research teams and institutions have different roles.
Milestones in her career
Documented work and biographical milestones.
Orbital calculation
Coauthor with T. H. Skopinski
Mercury flight
Checking calculations
Retirement from Langley
Biographical milestone
Sources and documents
- 01
Determination of Azimuth Angle at Burnout for Placing a Satellite Over a Selected Earth Position
T. H. Skopinski · Katherine G. Johnson · NASA TN D-233 ·
Original technical report · 1960
- 02
Katherine Johnson · Biography · NASA
Margot Lee Shetterly · NASA ·
Verified on
Editorial method
The contribution is checked against the original report; biographical claims are attributed to NASA. Sources, roles and limitations are kept explicit. Illustrations explain concepts and do not constitute experimental evidence.
Profile written and translated with AI from the cited sources. Automated checks; no independent human review claimed. Editorial method