The real number
Definition
A real number is a point on the continuous line. Integers, fractions, roots and π all hold a place there, with no position left empty.
It is this absence of gaps that defines the set R, far more than the list of numbers it contains.
What each widening brings
| Set | Contains | Makes possible |
|---|---|---|
| N | 0, 1, 2, … | Counting |
| Z | … , −1, 0, 1, … | Subtracting without leaving |
| Q | The fractions p/q | Dividing without leaving |
| R | The points of the line | Taking limits without leaving |
Each floor repairs a lack in the one below. The last is of another nature: it is no longer an operation that fails, but a sequence with nowhere to land.
The gap in the rationals
No fraction has 2 as its square. Suppose p/q is in lowest terms with (p/q)2=2: then p2=2q2, so p is even, so p=2m, so 4m2=2q2, so q is even too. Both are even, against the assumption of lowest terms.
Yet 2 exists: it is the diagonal of the unit square. The rationals therefore leave a gap at a perfectly constructible place.
Completeness
The property that sets R apart fits in one sentence: every non-empty set bounded above has a least upper bound.
Take the set of rationals whose square is less than 2. It is non-empty, it is bounded above — but within Q it has no smallest upper bound: a tighter one can always be found. In R that smallest upper bound exists, and it is 2.
This property characterises R: up to isomorphism, it is the only complete totally ordered field.
A larger infinity
The rationals can be numbered: they can be arranged in a list indexed by the integers. The reals cannot — no list exhausts them.
The infinity of the reals is therefore strictly vaster than that of the rationals, even though the latter are everywhere dense among the former: between two distinct reals, however close, a rational always slips in.
Summary
The real is the rational completed: taking a limit always lands somewhere.
